Plasmoid technology and how it may relate

1

Well here is some interesting stuff. It will be interesting to see how this affects all sorts of things with the tychos and beyond.
I am adding this on 27/12/22
Not that i believe this new plasmoid model. But.
I have personally asked Randal C to look at the TYCHOS and, so have other people i know. I am not sure if he ever looked at it… anyway, “Sacred Geometry” number for the great year in this is 25920.
so i just find it interesting trying to compare the two. How resonance is big in both models.
Cheers.

Merry Christmas Everyone!!!

:gift: —>youtu.be/wvI1Hv7DD98
A conversation on Plasmoid Unification with Malcom Bendall
(as was mentioned on #joerogan ep#1897)

2

Here’s more information On the plasmoid technology that I mentioned earlier.

Just in case you want to look into it. And you should.

In section-2 Bendall discusses the orbits of the planets and the moon’s importance as a time keeping device.

3

We know there are number sequences preserved in history and based on geometry and nature. Often referred to as sacred geometry and derived from squaring a circle, like the Fibonacci series for example.
I don’ t understand the numbers well enough to figure out the correlations between the “Sacred Geometry” numbers and the Tychos. So I am wondering if anyone has given this any thought.
Here are some questions I have related to this topic.
Is it possible to find the Tychos numbers in the sacred numbers? or vice-versa.
Is there a relationship between 25920yrs or 25344yrs, a difference of 576 years, for the Great Year?
Is this difference caused by not knowing that the earth has its own orbit?

4

There isn’t really any firm consensus as to the exact duration of the so-called “Great Year”. Astronomy literature will often cite the “25920” value derived from Hipparchus’ pretty good reckoning of a precession rate of 1° every 72 years (72 X 360 = 25920). Modern estimates however oscillate around 25771 years - which is about 1.68% more than the TYCHOS figure of 25344 years - for a full, 360° ‘equinoctial precession’. The reason for this 1.68% discrepancy is expounded and illustrated in Chapter 12 of my book. And yes, it is directly caused - as you put it - “by not knowing that the Earth has its own orbit.” :slight_smile:

1 Like