Delighted to see someone who studied physics on the forum with his thinking cap on. A warm welcome @stateless3 I would appreciate your input on this:
The common thread as to why physics was turned upside down
It’s been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt by Simon Shack, that the Copernican/Heliocentric model is disprovable. www.tychos.space But we currently live in a world where this is not accepted. And to speculate as to why that is, I could say the following. Reason and science is always the primary enemy of the aristocracy. Why? Because if reason is the ultimate authority as to what is true and false, then dogma cannot be. So in any aristocracy, it’s always of the highest priority to ensure that dogma rule over reason. But it has to be done in such a way that the people believe that the dogma is in fact reason. Dogma perceived as reasonable truth is the very essence of the aristocracy’s authority, and without it, they cannot rule. And to ensure this they stack more unreasonable dogma on top of the existing, so that it becomes unlikely that the people manage to see through all the deceptions. So if some dogmas fall, they can always rally up and protect the ones behind it. And I happen to think that the Heliocentric model is one of the core dogmas that others have been stacked upon in order to protect it and to create “lines of defense” to fall back on. And thus, the Heliocentric model has been (and is) very important to protect.
Moving on to physics, we have during the 20th century adapted a most peculiar view in this field. In everyday life, or the macrocosm as it is sometimes referred to, we accept the laws of logic and physics that have been discovered and confirmed throughout the ages. But in the so called microcosm, the laws of thought and logic (Law of thought - Wikipedia) do not apply anymore, since we’ve allegedly discovered that a photon - a microscopic particle, can be at two places at once, change it’s behavior depending on the expectations of the observer, and even change the flow of time itself. And of course, if this is what can be concluded from proper and relevant experiments and observations, then this should and must be accepted. But when examining this, we can find that other more reasonable explanations do in fact exist. According to the scientific method a proper scientific experiment needs to be controlled. Meaning that it is carefully examined and ruled out that anything besides what is deliberately altered in the experiment can affect its outcome. But it seems this has not been done regarding the modified double slit experiment that forms the very foundation for Quantum Mechanics. Please read this short article to understand what the problem is with the current interpretation of this experiment: https://medium.com/the-electromagnetic-universe/the-double-slit-experiment-explained-from-a-non-quantum-mechanics-view-point-ab648f029f9d
And if this is the case - that the so called photon detectors affect the behavior of the light, since they are not passive but emit electromagnetism, then undoubtedly, QM needs to be filed in the round archive (the trash bin). And light and other electromagnetism then go back to being nothing other than a wave propagation since that is what can be concluded by the (unmodified) double slit experiment and many other experiments. And the axioms of logic that have been valid since their conception by the old Greeks, can also apply in the microcosm. And now onto the common thread I promised.
In his historical book Simon exposes that the Michelson–Morley experiment did not in fact produce a null result, but a consistent result that confirms the suggested speed of Earth in his Tychos Model. Chapter 24: Dayton Miller - and the speed of Earth – Nextra The reason it is argued to be null, is because it is much too small to confirm the speed required for Earth to be orbiting the Sun (107000 kph or about 90x the speed of sound). And here I propose we have it ladies, gentlemen. If light and electromagnetism is a plain, dull and ordinary wave through an aether, that follows the common laws of reason and physics, then Heliocentrism is disproven by this experiment. And we can’t have that, can we!? So onwards with Einstein, Feynman and Quantum Mysticism!
And another benefit to this course of action for the Nutwork/PowersThatBe, if it is indeed the case, is that physics and energy science will remain dead in their tracks until this problem in physics is discovered and sorted out. It’s also notable that the scientists that developed the electro science needed for our current power grids (Steinmetz, Heaviside et. al.) all did it using aether physics.