We don’t have much to go on, and the tools are limited, but what if the orbits could be explained electromagnetically, instead of gravitationally? If stars, planets, and moons possess electric charge, and if there is an electric plasma current feeding the system, couldn’t it be that the so-called gravitational field is a wave interference pattern, a sort of rotating magnetic field…or something like that? What is needed is a 3-D wave interference simulator, with enough power to handle three bodies.
Hello FSM - and welcome to the forum.
I also welcome your good questions - although I’d like to make it clear (once more) that my TYCHOS model has no pretense, at this stage, to provide some sort of “TOE” (Theory Of Everything") as to the physics, dynamics, forces and mechanics that regulate our Universe. I have just concentrated on figuring out the true geometrics of our SS (Solar System) - using the best observational data available to mankind today - and have shown that the geometry implied by the heliocentric model simply doesn’t work.
With this caveat out of the way, I do however dare say that the TYCHOS model provides overwhelming evidence that indicates that our Solar System is a ‘holistically inter-connected clockwork mechanism’ - what with ALL of its planets’ orbital periods being exact / integer multiples of our Moon’s average synodic period of 29.22 days (which I have called the TMSP - the True Mean Synodic Period). And yes, this would certainly seem to suggest that some (yet-to-be-understood) electromagnetic forces are at play. In fact, in Chapter 16 of my book you will find the below ‘conceptual’ graphic - tentatively titled “The electromechanics of the TYCHOS system” 
)
Again, welcome ‘on board’, FSM !
1 Like
Makes sense. Circular constant speed orbits can be reproduced using magnets as shown in the video in the “Initial thoughts” thread. The Moon could cause tides not because of gravitational pull but because it locally disturbs Earth’s magnetic field.
1 Like
I found the following three videos while doing a YouTube search on the topic of electrogravity:
From the first, it may be that gravity is an electrical induction force due to the converging field lines drawing bodies toward the convergence.
From the second, it may be that inertia is an electromagnetic induction force, which resists a change in charge motion.
From the third, it may be that with adequate voltage (caution), an asymmetric capacitor can cause anomalous effects. This would entail perhaps 1,250,000 volts (very dangerous and expensive research).
Interesting, I’ll watch them for sure. Let me share one of my favorite videos that demonstrates that magnetism can be explained with fluid dynamics, which further supports the aether and wave-light theory.
1 Like
She is interesting. She’s spent a lot of time and effort trying to figure this all out. Not an easy task.
I’ve watched those videos. They where interesting but also problematic since they manifest Einstein and quantum mystics in the background. I don’t give any credibility to that anymore. Einsteins job was to disrupt the physics that put the heliocentric model in jeopardy - Aether physics. And if interpreted reasonably, the double slit experiment still confirms that light is a wave and nothing else
But what is gravity then? My favourite speculation is that its simply a result of “condensing aether”. At the center of Earth a process is ongoing that condenses aether and elements into heavier ones (aether gasses->hydrogen->helium->nitrogen etc). This in turn creates a “low pressure” in the aether since the condensed aether occupies less space. And the equilibrium effect then causes aether from the surroundings to rush in to equalise the pressure. And the constant “aether wind” towards the Earth center is what causes gravity.
Just about all videos that provide helpful information are contaminated to some extent with false ideas like those of Einstein. I learned to read between the lines. I know it is irritating. I force myself to put up with as much of it as I can stand so I don’t miss the good stuff…like that experiment with the aluminum pie plates, for example.
1 Like
“One thing about which fish know exactly nothing is water, since they have no anti-environment which would enable them to perceive the element they live in.” - Marshall McLuhan
And this is the reason most people, including myself until a couple of years ago, don’t immediately see how unreasonable it is that rockets would create thrust in the vacuum of space. We’re like a crab that sees a dolphin swim and don’t find it odd if someone shows us a video of a dolphin swimming in air.
And since this is the case, we are also oblivious to the medium that exists when the air is removed which is commonly referred to as a vacuum. Inertia that I would argue is aether resistance, is as incomprehensible to us as air resistance is to a fish.
And if we assume what experiments like the double slit test has confirmed - that in the vacuum there’s a viscous medium that propagates light and electromagnetism, this medium could also explain gravity as described previously.
Hi guys, I totally agree with the aether gravity theory Patrik mentioned. You’ve blown my mind with the tychos and in my case I see it as a total confirmation of the electric characteristics of the universe. Looking at the traces in tychosium… can we confidently say the natural frequency of the system is 1 cycle per year? Considering such low frequencies… is it too crazy to think in 1 cycle per day?